Flock Cameras and the Surveillance State

Introduction
Recently installed within 49 states, hundreds of thousands of these AI-powered license-plate-reading cameras have been used to monitor and assist law enforcement in distributing tickets and fines. However, recently, there have been concerns about the actual purpose of these cameras, including outrages such as police using them to stalk their former partners or falsely giving out tickets to innocent people.

Founding Story
Flock Safety, the company behind Flock Cameras, was founded in 2017 by Garrett Langley, Matt Feury, and Paige Todd. Garrett, an electrical engineer, and Matt, a software developer, while initially told that license plate readers were expensive and difficult to find, collaborated to create a cheaper and more readily available prototype for their neighborhood in response to a string of break-ins. This would illuminate large amounts of evidence and would lead to a chain of arrests. ^1

Flock Camera Purpose
Flock Camera’s main purpose is to help to identify vehicles for law enforcement to help identify vehicles that may have been connected to a crime. This can include things such as speeding or reckless driving but can also help to combat kidnapping, burglary, theft, etc. Instead of officers having to rely on eyewitness reports or search through long recordings, they can quickly and effectively identify vehicles using Flock cameras.

Specific Stories and Outrages
However, recently, there have been concerns about its privacy overreach. People believe that it’s turning cities into mass surveillance. On August 26, 2026, a police officer in Kentucky used the Flock camera to track his former partner over 2,000 times, abusing his power and using it to see where she commutes daily. ^2 Specific critics argue that the surveillance doesn’t have clear consent and that it tracks everyday citizens without adequate public oversight.

General Opinion of Them, Riots, etc.
Across 36 states, people have used cars, spray paint, guns, etc. to take down these cameras. In Dallas alone, 25 cameras were damaged or removed out of the 650 in the city.^3 Over 100 cities nationwide have canceled their Flock Contracts after protests and riots, with that number steadily increasing. On September 10th, 2026, six of the eight Flock cameras in the city of Morehead were destroyed, rendering a majority of the city camera-less.^4

The Future of Flock

So, while there may be good in the cameras for crime solving, efficiency, and community security, there are still many concerns in the realms of mass surveillance, misuse and abuse, and privacy risks for ordinary citizens. It remains to be seen whether the outcome for Flock cameras will be a positive or negative one.

Sources:
https://www.flocksafety.com/careers ^1
https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/26/us/flock-kentucky-police-officer-arrest ^2
https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/dallas-police-defend-flock-cameras-as-vandalism-privacy-concerns-grow/4058040/ ^3
https://www.wkyt.com/2026/09/10/majority-city-moreheads-flock-cameras-destroyed-act-vandalism/ ^4

Author